Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CandG
    Spent $299 for this text!
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2014
    • 16970

    Originally posted by meanspartan
    Yep. That's part of the problem. While we have some alright odds of getting 6 friendlies given the Ninth isn't quite as hard left as it used to be, we automatically start down 1-0 and have to get 6 of the remaining 10 spots.
    The bigger problem is that the 10 other judges are chosen at "random", not at random. The quotes are important here.



    The odds of flipping "heads" on a coin toss are infinitely better if nobody is watching you and you can keep flipping the coin until you get "heads".

    The method by which Sydney Thomas "randomly" selects his panels is completely opaque, nobody knows how it is done, and AFAIK nobody oversees it to ensure true randomness or elimination of bias.
    Last edited by CandG; 06-10-2021, 12:06 PM.
    Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


    Comment

    • jwkincal
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 1602

      Originally posted by CandG
      The method by which Sydney Thomas "randomly" selects his panels is completely opaque, nobody knows how it is done, and AFAIK nobody oversees it to ensure true randomness or elimination of bias.
      http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/rules/rules.htm#pID0E0YJ0HA

      I'd concede that it's not as "transparent" as we'd perhaps prefer, but it isn't exactly a mystery. The clerk puts all the eligible Judge's names into a basket, then draws them out until there are 10. Some Judge (any Judge) watches.

      Foolproof? No. Random? Yes, if the rules are followed. Subject to corruption? Of course, but so is every other part of the process. Worth risking a career on a single case about a single issue? Doubtful.
      Get the hell off the beach. Get up and get moving. Follow Me! --Aubrey Newman, Col, 24th INF; at the Battle of Leyte

      Certainty of death... small chance of success... what are we waiting for? --Gimli, son of Gloin; on attacking the vast army of Mordor

      Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
      --Patrick Henry; Virginia, 1775

      Comment

      • ShadowGuy
        Member
        • Jan 2015
        • 468

        Originally posted by CandG
        That is just a notice to Benitez's court that says "we filed an appeal with the 9th". It isn't the actual appeal; the appeal itself hasn't been posted online yet.
        Thanks! It will be interesting on what grounds they will claim to have standing on the appeal. Given the complacency of the CA9 on with the state, I wonder how weak of a reason it will be.
        ...Well, Mr. Dangerfield can feel better about himself now, because with Proposition 63, the Second Amendment gets even less respect than he does....
        - Hon. Roger T. Benitez

        Comment

        • Full Clip
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Dec 2006
          • 10260

          Originally posted by HibikiR
          Question: If California loses with the 9th, then does that mean any state in the 9th's jurisdiction can expect freedom (or sue for it) from AW bans too?
          No, it means CA will take it to SCOTUS before that happens.
          No way d-bag Newsome will back off this.

          Comment

          • HibikiR
            Senior Member
            • May 2014
            • 2417

            How long does it usually take for the actual appeal doc to appear?

            Comment

            • ????? ????
              Senior Member
              • May 2014
              • 991

              Originally posted by HibikiR
              Is an appeal a separate legal thing from an application for a stay?

              Comment

              • SkyHawk
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Sep 2012
                • 23374

                Here is the full press conference if you can stomach it




                Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

                Comment

                • abinsinia
                  Veteran Member
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 4035

                  There are some new documents filed. Case schedule and docket number it looks like.

                  9th circuit docket number 21-55608

                  Comment

                  • Betfair39
                    Member
                    • May 2017
                    • 125

                    Originally posted by SkyHawk
                    Here is the full press conference if you can stomach it




                    lol she says judge is handpicked by NRA??? is this even legal in america to accuse judges and the 9th circuit like that?
                    LA County CCW Progress:
                    06/27/2022: Mailed in application
                    09/19/2022: Check cashed in
                    08/28/2023: Phone Interview
                    09/01/2023: Livescan
                    10/09/2023: Livescan completed
                    12/05/2023: Training Submitted & confirmed receipt
                    03/13/2024: Call for Pickup
                    04/10/2024: Picked up the CCW license!

                    Comment

                    • Tere_Hanges
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 6250

                      Originally posted by SkyHawk
                      Here is the full press conference if you can stomach it




                      Haha, save it for the judge morons. I really hope we get a fair shake at SCOTUS but Im not holding my breath.
                      CRPA and NRA member.

                      Note that those who have repeatedly expressed enough vile and incoherent content as to render your views irrelevant, have been placed on my ignore list. Thank you for helping me improve my experience and direct my attention towards those who are worthy of it. God bless your toxic little souls.

                      Comment

                      • kuug
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2014
                        • 773

                        Originally posted by meanspartan
                        Probably not going to matter actually. People are overlooking that Rupp v. Becerra is way ahead of this case. It already has been assigned a panel and has been briefed and argued. It's just stayed pending Duncan.

                        Presumably, Rupp will get decided first and be controlling on Miller.

                        https://crpa.org/news/blogs/californ...or-gun-owners/
                        Rupp is challenging different sections of the penal code. PC 30510, 30520, and 30925. Miller is challenging PC 30800, 30910, 30915, and 31000. They're completely different lawsuits.

                        Comment

                        • press1280
                          Veteran Member
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 3023

                          Originally posted by kuug
                          En banc is actually 11 judges. Sydney Thomas+10 "randoms"
                          I believe Sidney Thomas' term expires this year (7 year term as chief). It would then go to (by my calculation) Kim Wardlaw until 2024 when she turns 70 and is then barred by circuit rules. After that it goes to the younger Obama judges as all other appointees from Clinton and Bush will be too old.
                          So it looks like we'll be always spotting the other side 1 judge for all en banc cases for a while.

                          Comment

                          • BAJ475
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Jul 2014
                            • 5030

                            Originally posted by SkyHawk
                            Here is the full press conference if you can stomach it




                            Was easy to stomach. Actually had me grinning on how full of BS they are. Of course, I am not subject to any of their BS.

                            Comment

                            • HKAllTheThings
                              Senior Member
                              • Jun 2020
                              • 1313

                              Didn't realize until that video that Judge Benitez pulled the vaccine death equivalence thing.

                              You so crazy Beni

                              Comment

                              • pacrat
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • May 2014
                                • 10254

                                Originally posted by BAJ475
                                [1] ... Hawaii just bans assault pistols. AR style rifles are not banned. [2] ... They are banned in CA if not registered and registration is closed. That is as close to a per se ban as I can imagine.

                                [1] ... OK my news source was lacking on the Hi ban. I admit I don't closely follow any AW stuff. But fully support any non prohibited person from having any damn thing they want.

                                [2] ... Ca is not quite banned. Even thought they call it that. Neutered ARs can still be legally bought/possessed, as long as it complies with "features".

                                It's all semantics. But the devil is in the details.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1