Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Failure to eject in to a double feed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul053
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 1061

    Failure to eject in to a double feed

    So I've been having random extraction issues since I took a pistol class last month. I have a gen3 g19 with a 336 ejector, stock extractor, apex safety block with reduced power spring, extra power trigger spring, overwatch precision falx trigger. In addition I get brass to face every now and then, maybe once every 60 rounds or so. Initially I thought I had carbon build up on the extractor which I cleaned out. In the class I was shooting federal aluminum case which is relatively low power stuff so I initially chalked it up to that. But today I was shooting my HD load which is federal hst 147gr standard pressure and it happened again. It fails to eject the last case and tries to load a round in the chamber. If I do a tap rack it kicks out the spent case but then causes a double feed. Any ideas for a fix? So far this has happened about 5 times all within the last few months. Pretty new gun with less than 1500 rounds on it but at least double in dry fire.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
  • #2
    gaberaynes
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 852

    does your wrist get little limp around the 60th round
    sigpic


    Building a 1911 with a rock in a Cavehttp://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=957081

    Comment

    • #3
      AreWeFree
      Veteran Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 4558

      I see your 10-8 sights, any other modifications?

      If it's completely stock except for sights, and you're having constant malfunctions, throw it away and buy another, or have someone else try to reproduce the problem with several hundred rounds. Keeping it is a range toy/training gun also makes sense.

      Comment

      • #4
        P5Ret
        Calguns Addict
        • Oct 2010
        • 6304

        When you say reduced power spring are you talking about the recoil spring? If that's the case I'd switch that back to stock weight, see if that clear's up the problem.

        Comment

        • #5
          AreWeFree
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 4558

          Oh I see you made considerable modifications, you did this to yourself, take care.

          Comment

          • #6
            blkside
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2012
            • 1301

            Return to stock. Problem Solved.
            Originally posted by TonyNorCal
            If I'm going to spend money to touch a woman then it's going to be at a Nevada brothel, on Craiglist hooker, or trolling the streets in a camper van.

            Comment

            • #7
              tradecraft
              Veteran Member
              • Jul 2008
              • 4534

              How did it shoot stock?
              Link to my feedback: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1884562

              Comment

              • #8
                CandG
                Spent $299 for this text!
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Apr 2014
                • 16970

                Originally posted by AreWeFree
                Oh I see you made considerable modifications, you did this to yourself, take care.
                Yup

                Originally posted by blkside
                Return to stock. Problem Solved.
                Yup.

                OP, what was wrong with the stock pistol that you were trying to solve with all of those modifications? Because, I can tell you what's wrong with your Glock now that you've added all that junk - it fails to eject.

                Not trying to be a smart*** (ok, maybe a little), but if you tell us what the multitude of problems were with the stock pistol that you were trying to solve with all that aftermarket stuff, it might help us find the source of the problem. Maybe the pistol is just a lemon, if it was that bad from the start.

                Also, Glock springs are notoriously lightweight to begin with. Making it even lighter could certainly cause problems.
                Last edited by CandG; 01-27-2017, 11:37 PM.
                Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


                Comment

                • #9
                  smak28
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 4120

                  There can be many possibilities especially with the aftermarket parts you installed. However, I believe there was a recall on 336 ejectors and believe Glock stopped using those, but the people with more knowledge about Glocks can chime in. Look into that.
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Paul053
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 1061

                    None of those modifications would cause the extraction issues. Those are very common mods to lighten up and smooth out the trigger. As laid out in this article http://www.militarytimes.com/story/m...tips/32154307/

                    Recoil spring is stock as is striker spring.

                    Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk
                    Last edited by Paul053; 01-28-2017, 12:03 AM.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      AreWeFree
                      Veteran Member
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 4558

                      Originally posted by Paul053
                      None of those modifications would cause the extraction issues. Those are very common mods to lighten up and smooth out the trigger. As laid out in this article http://www.militarytimes.com/story/m...tips/32154307/

                      Recoil spring is stock as is striker spring.

                      Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk
                      1. Contact Glock for warranty.
                      2. Troubleshoot it yourself, return ALL parts to stock and begin testing. Don't forget known good ammo.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        smak28
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 4120

                        Here's a thread about the 336 ejector: http://www.glockforum.com/forum/f8/336-ejector-2241/

                        They also mentioned brass to the face. Did you buy it with the 336 ejector?
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          mjmagee67
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 2771

                          It's amazing how many people know nothing about the way guns work yet offer opinions on how to fix it. There are literally 100s of thousand Glocks with the type of mods the guy made, and they all work fine.

                          It you are getting ejection issues there are 3 main areas to look. The first is the ejector. How does the ejector look? Is it bent or broken? Second, the extractor, is it moving free? How does the "hook" look? Does it have a burr or lip it's not suppose to. Is the spring and rod moving freely? The third is the recoil spring. In general the type of malfunction he is having is caused be too strong of recoil spring. A weaker spring will allow the slide to move back faster, knocking the empty case out faster and harder. Weak ammo can also cause this as could a sticking slide..

                          Putting a lighter striker spring or heavier trigger spring have a similar affect as a lighter recoil spring. Changing those components causes less resistance to the slide moving back because the striker takes less energy to cock.

                          I would look at the extractor and it's associated part first. Those parts aren't that expensive.
                          If you want change you have to put in your 2 cents, you can't just sit on the sidelines and whine.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            billped
                            Veteran Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 2504

                            The responses are because many, if not most, Glock issues are caused by those types of modifications and the audience tires of diagnosing.

                            There is nothing necessarily wrong with modding your gun, but the resulting "it don't work no more" posts get kind of old.
                            Bill

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              deephouse
                              Veteran Member
                              • Sep 2012
                              • 3819

                              Originally posted by blkside
                              Return to stock. Problem Solved.


                              This


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1