|
California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sensitive places...?
https://youtu.be/_MODu98jMlQ
Saw this video on YouTube. Was wondering if this/how this is applied in California? Or is the ruling that California is California and the rules don't apply? Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
TLDR if a state or local government WANTS to create a sensitive place, the video asserts there are only 4 historically based areas; court houses, legislative chambers, polling places, and schools (for students only possibly).
Regardless any law that passes will have to be litigated, quite possibly up to SCOTUS. So don't expect any changes for years if anything passes (next year for CA). |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
It's "CliffsNotes" not "Cliff notes". [;>)
__________________
Benefactor Life Member, National Rifle Association Life Member, California Rifle and Pistol Association |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Not litigation in CA, so moved.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If it's a "sensitive place," it better have a security control that everyone must pass through. Can't say it's a no-go for legal carry if there's no mechanism to detect illegal carry.
Public transportation doesn't qualify. Times Square doesn't qualify. A restaurant, a church, a shopping center doesn't qualify. A courthouse? The secure part of an airport? Sure. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Once they ram through the new version of SB-918, basically everywhere in a building or public area in California will become a sensitive place. Yes, that's illegal and unconstitutional under the NYSRPA SCOTUS Opinion.
Does California care? Hell no. We're already up to our armpits here in Unconstitutional, therefore illegal laws. What's one more if it helps to disarm and hassle law abiding citizens?
__________________
NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I wonder if schools are historically sensitive places. My high school had a rifle team, and stored the school's onsite. I also remember a lot of hunting rifles in truck racks during deer season.
__________________
California, the once-great first world state that is now a corrupt third world socialist cesspool. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I was just talking to an old friend about the time in 1978 we were joined by the woodshoop and football coach at Buena Park high school parking lot looking at the new Brownings that we had just bought and were taking shooting after school.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Granada Hills high school in the SFV had rifle club. Kids would bring their M1's to school every Thorsday.
No one gave them a second look. Try that today and you are dead. California is a sensitive area, too many libs and Karens that will be offended. It's not Arizona. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
All the lawyers can blather on endlessly about “working within the system”, bla, bla, bla, but here we are long after Heller, and not too far past Bruen, and for all practical purposes aren’t any better off. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The government can, using the peoples money, create an almost limitless number of unconstitutional laws with no repercussion for individual politicians. What would THT call that? #Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. #Let’s go Brandon! #FJB
__________________
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Well, there's an election coming up in November, including for the offices of governor and attorney general along with others. Get out and vote for the candidates you would prefer to see in office, including the two just mentioned.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
People will just ignore sensitive places and whoever gets charged will likely bring this case to the SCOTUS, which will then invalidate the whole scheme. Similar to the taser case from the east coast.
We need to fight it, but we also have to remember that Bruen gives us quite a bit of rights against laws that conflict with that decision. It's similar to having regulations that are not squared with the law (wink, BB AWB, wink), not complying and challenging them to try to enforce the law. There are sodomy laws on the books in many parts of the country even though Lawrence v. Texas has been around for almost two decades. Those laws are just ignored by anyone. CA and NY will end up in the same boat with their anti-gun laws - a bunch of unenforceable laws on the books that nobody cares about. It's just a matter of getting that one test criminal case to push it through the legal system.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|