|
General gun discussions This is a place to lounge and discuss firearm related topics with other forum members. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
2021 Transfer to son
Quick question. In September of 2021, I moved to Florida. Before I left, I completed the inter family firearm transfer. Among the firearms transferred was a California compliant AR15. Today, I got a text from my son and he received a letter from the DOJ requesting pictures of the AR15... I asked my son to sent me a picture of the letter.
Has anyone experienced anything similar??
__________________
67siia |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There is no legal reason to provide pictures of any firearms to the CA DOJ when submitting this; or any other, form. They are asking for them to "make sure the rifle is CA compliant". Of course if they see something that they don't like like they will send nice men out to the house around 0300 hours. He could reply to them to provide the CA PC that requires him to provide pictures or do nothing at all. Sent from my Amazon Fire Tablet using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If it went from son to dad, son should say "sorry, the rifle is out of state and my dad and I are not on speaking terms." Dad to son (most likely I guess) then it looks like you are correct, could not find any mention of photo for intrafamilial xfer. That being said, I am not familiar with how purchasing a CA compliant AR15 works; perhaps when it does not go through an FFL there is some rule that indicates that a photo is required to "make sure" it's CA compliant that comes into effect? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As an Oregon resident, I no longer have 'standing' to ask this, but I think some or several of the victims of CA-DOJ's illegal demands ought to contact CRPA, to see if they would write a legal notice to CA-DOJ amounting to 'get a warrant'.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sent from my LE2115 using Tapatalk |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Father transferred to son. Son lives in California
Quote:
__________________
67siia |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Not intrafamilial, and not in-CA PPT. Both CA and Federal law allow no-FFL transfer of inherited firearms; CA has the limitation of CA-defined immediate family, while Feds don't care. Transfer to non-family 'strangers', any family outside the parent/child and grandparent/grandchild lines must use an FFL, and then for in-CA it would be a PPT, so again 1-in-30 does not usually apply (there's that Los Angeles thing).
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
F the traitorous CA doj...disgusting
__________________
Beans and Bullets 2x SKS Trench Art $480 & $500 https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...8#post28101198 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|