Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Rimfire Firearms
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Rimfire Firearms .22, .17 and other Rimfire Handguns and Rifles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #281  
Old 06-23-2013, 8:41 AM
Maddawg46 Maddawg46 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Central California
Posts: 729
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

To keep this info fresh..........I see people stating all the semi auto rifles they own. Why would you tell the DOJ this? Your asking for trouble down the road.
__________________
This year will go down in history.... Don't want to offend anybody
Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old 06-23-2013, 9:36 AM
e_tar's Avatar
e_tar e_tar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 40
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I'm waiting for someone to go on a mass killing spree using a butter knife... of course its possible.. unarmed sheep will stand in line waiting their turn patiently... then maybe those lib idiots will see that it is the individual not the weapon that is to blame.

Oh but after the cops shoot the perp, they might just say he used an assault weapon and leave out the fact that it was in the trunk of his car at the time.. just like sandy hook.
__________________
,.,.,.,.,.
Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old 06-23-2013, 10:25 AM
sdkevin's Avatar
sdkevin sdkevin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,248
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
I see people stating all the semi auto rifles they own. Why would you tell the DOJ this? Your asking for trouble down the road.
True, sheeple will get in line.
__________________
After watching WTC Bldg #7 being razed, and considering it's main occupants..

I stumbled onto this note while checking advanced weapons..
"911 = false flag. WTC 7 was brought down by demolition. 47 floors came down in 6 1/2 seconds - not hit by a plane. Just one of hundreds of absurdities that occurred that day. Wake up".
Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old 06-23-2013, 1:21 PM
CWDraco CWDraco is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 3,359
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maddawg46 View Post
To keep this info fresh..........I see people stating all the semi auto rifles they own. Why would you tell the DOJ this? Your asking for trouble down the road.
They don't need this thread for that.
Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old 06-23-2013, 1:26 PM
orangeusa's Avatar
orangeusa orangeusa is offline
Whatever
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orange
Posts: 9,055
iTrader: 85 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy43 View Post
Lest we forget, some of us (??%) own the venerable Marlin 60. More sold than all other semi-auto .22lr put together. Just couldn't resist
I bought one, couldn't resist buying another one after all my guns were lost in that boating accident. This seems like a fud thread...

.
Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old 06-23-2013, 1:51 PM
mshill mshill is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beyond the reach...
Posts: 4,228
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy43 View Post
Lest we forget, some of us (??%) own the venerable Marlin 60. More sold than all other semi-auto .22lr put together. Just couldn't resist
My dad has a Marlin 60. My wife just jailed one, and I have to get another for my FN2000 .22 conversion. I believe it falls under the "in common use for lawful purposes" category.
Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old 06-23-2013, 1:56 PM
Quiet's Avatar
Quiet Quiet is online now
retired Goon
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Bernardino County
Posts: 30,054
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

FYI.
As last amended, the bill will also classify any semi-auto rifle with a fixed capacity of greater than 10 rounds as an assault weapon.

So, the Marlin Model 60 would also be considered an assault weapon due to it's 14-18 round capacity.
__________________


"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).
Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old 06-23-2013, 1:57 PM
Quiet's Avatar
Quiet Quiet is online now
retired Goon
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Bernardino County
Posts: 30,054
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mshill View Post
I believe it falls under the "in common use for lawful purposes" category.
No such thing under CA laws.
__________________


"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).
Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old 06-23-2013, 4:31 PM
mshill mshill is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beyond the reach...
Posts: 4,228
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quiet View Post
No such thing under CA laws.
True, however, in US v Miller, SCOTUS said exactly that.
Reply With Quote
  #290  
Old 06-23-2013, 4:41 PM
Tekkno Tekkno is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 461
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Had the law passed? the rimfire with removeable magazine ban
Reply With Quote
  #291  
Old 06-23-2013, 5:58 PM
Quiet's Avatar
Quiet Quiet is online now
retired Goon
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Bernardino County
Posts: 30,054
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tekkno View Post
Had the law passed? the rimfire with removeable magazine ban
Passed the CA Senate, currently in the CA Assembly.
__________________


"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).
Reply With Quote
  #292  
Old 06-23-2013, 6:10 PM
CWDraco CWDraco is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 3,359
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mshill View Post
True, however, in US v Miller, SCOTUS said exactly that.
To apply that, you need to get arrested, get convicted and file an appeal. I could be wrong, I'm no lawyer. At the least you would need a plaintiff and present the case as was done via Harrot vs Kings county.

There is no way US V Miller is going to over turn this law (if it passes) or be used by Elected Officials to repeal it.
Reply With Quote
  #293  
Old 06-23-2013, 8:41 PM
mshill mshill is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beyond the reach...
Posts: 4,228
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWDraco View Post
.There is no way US V Miller is going to over turn this law (if it passes) or be used by Elected Officials to repeal it.
It was referenced in the Heller decision against a handgun ban, why wouldn't it be used here. Additionally, Heller wasn't arrested, he was a cop that wanted a handgun for HD. Why wouldn't the exact same approach be used for common rifles?
Reply With Quote
  #294  
Old 06-23-2013, 8:46 PM
problemchild problemchild is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 33.753276,-118.19139
Posts: 6,959
iTrader: 82 / 100%
Default

HEY ALL YOU DEMOCRATS..........

So you told me the Dems NEVER pass gun bans huh?
Reply With Quote
  #295  
Old 06-23-2013, 8:53 PM
problemchild problemchild is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 33.753276,-118.19139
Posts: 6,959
iTrader: 82 / 100%
Default

Vote with your feet people. You can stay here and suffer hit after hit from the socialist-progressive politicians or you can move to a free state.
Reply With Quote
  #296  
Old 06-24-2013, 7:48 AM
Quiet's Avatar
Quiet Quiet is online now
retired Goon
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Bernardino County
Posts: 30,054
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by problemchild View Post
Vote with your feet people. You can stay here and suffer hit after hit from the socialist-progressive politicians or you can move to a free state.
This is one of the reasons why CA is what it is, people who would be opposed to it left (easier to run away than fight). Which allowed the progressives to come into power and take control.
__________________


"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).
Reply With Quote
  #297  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:03 AM
rollme's Avatar
rollme rollme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kalifornutistan del Sur
Posts: 121
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

I have one word for this and any other "unconstitutional" legislation... nullification.
__________________
"Liberty isn't going to come by trying to take over Washington DC, or the republican party, or the democratic party, or your state caucus or a national convention. There is no “lesser of two evils.” They’re all evil."
Michael Boldin
TAC
http://www.selfgovernment.us
Reply With Quote
  #298  
Old 06-24-2013, 4:24 PM
JustEd's Avatar
JustEd JustEd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 988
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quiet View Post
This is one of the reasons why CA is what it is, people who would be opposed to it left (easier to run away than fight). Which allowed the progressives to come into power and take control.
You have a point, but its a losing battle to stay, IMO. Think it best to move to a free state and try to defend from the same disease moving there. At least it makes sense to fight the fight from a defensible position.
Reply With Quote
  #299  
Old 06-25-2013, 7:29 AM
qdx450 qdx450 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: way south
Posts: 416
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

time to recall!! and repeal those laws!!!.... like colorado. funny thing is i know of 16 cops that are not going to register all of their guns, specially ar15. they know something we dont.
Reply With Quote
  #300  
Old 06-25-2013, 12:36 PM
problemchild problemchild is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 33.753276,-118.19139
Posts: 6,959
iTrader: 82 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quiet View Post
This is one of the reasons why CA is what it is, people who would be opposed to it left (easier to run away than fight). Which allowed the progressives to come into power and take control.
100% --->WRONG!

The reason CA is overrun with socialists is because of open borders and entitlements. Low wage earning illegals/and-or their children vote HANDOUTS/ENTITLEMENTS (yes they do vote -illegally). Remove 15 million illegals from CA and all issues are solved.
The people offering the handouts/entitlements are the progressive-demorcrats. The P-D'ds are getting the vote of the LWE folks. The dumbing down of kids in public screwels didnt help with with this either.

To sum it up, the problem is:

Open borders and massive influx of low educated, low earning illegals.
Low/ no educated voters being pumped out of public SCREWels.
Low/ no educated low earning adults voting for handouts.
Progressive-Liberals bribing low-informed voters with entitlements.
Allowing illegals to break the law and come here to have 13 kids (WHO VOTE for more entitlements)

It has NOTHING to do with a few SMART folks leaving. But you are welcome to stay and be part of the gun ban carnage.

Im afraid its up to the states now. If the "FREE" states dont start fighting back the Fed-Machine then we WILL lose this country AWKI.

Last edited by problemchild; 06-25-2013 at 12:51 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #301  
Old 06-25-2013, 5:33 PM
fonzy's Avatar
fonzy fonzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 888
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by problemchild View Post
100% --->WRONG!

The reason CA is overrun with socialists is because of open borders and entitlements. Low wage earning illegals/and-or their children vote HANDOUTS/ENTITLEMENTS (yes they do vote -illegally). Remove 15 million illegals from CA and all issues are solved.
The people offering the handouts/entitlements are the progressive-demorcrats. The P-D'ds are getting the vote of the LWE folks. The dumbing down of kids in public screwels didnt help with with this either.

To sum it up, the problem is:

Open borders and massive influx of low educated, low earning illegals.
Low/ no educated voters being pumped out of public SCREWels.
Low/ no educated low earning adults voting for handouts.
Progressive-Liberals bribing low-informed voters with entitlements.
Allowing illegals to break the law and come here to have 13 kids (WHO VOTE for more entitlements)

It has NOTHING to do with a few SMART folks leaving. But you are welcome to stay and be part of the gun ban carnage.

Im afraid its up to the states now. If the "FREE" states dont start fighting back the Fed-Machine then we WILL lose this country AWKI.
Um NO. Don't blame Illegals they can't even vote. Don't blame them having kids. I guarantee they aren't voting for banning guns. Mexico can't have guns only criminals can. You think they want to continue this here?

This goes beyond that. First it starts with the gun control. 2nd we have seen the IRS targeting groups. 3rd it's obvious the government is tapping phone lines and using drones. 4th where are all these fema camps that are supposed to help us in natural disasters? Why didn't they help those folks in OK when the tornadoes struck. Now this Snowden fellow leaks what the governement is doing. The government labels him a spy. If it wasn't for him what else wouldn't we know about.

I seriously doubt my people the Illegals are behind this. Go somewhere else with that. I know California can't be the only state with Illegals yet were the ones with the stupid gunlaws. Come on now.

Last edited by fonzy; 06-25-2013 at 5:36 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #302  
Old 06-26-2013, 6:14 AM
rogervzv's Avatar
rogervzv rogervzv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,087
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fonzy View Post
Um NO. Don't blame Illegals they can't even vote. Don't blame them having kids. I guarantee they aren't voting for banning guns. Mexico can't have guns only criminals can. You think they want to continue this here?
Yes, I do. Once they get the vote, they vote Democrat. Democrats are the ones who are taking away our gun rights -- most votes are party-line votes. You bet that illegals who later turn legal or have kids who do end up voting to take your gun rights. They do.
__________________
Come and Take It!
I'm the only hell my momma ever raised ...
Reply With Quote
  #303  
Old 06-26-2013, 9:23 AM
skyblue's Avatar
skyblue skyblue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nonya
Posts: 436
iTrader: 23 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogervzv View Post
Yes, I do. Once they get the vote, they vote Democrat. Democrats are the ones who are taking away our gun rights -- most votes are party-line votes. You bet that illegals who later turn legal or have kids who do end up voting to take your gun rights. They do.
I respectfully beg to differ. Most immigrants chose to come to the United States because they were fleeing wars, persecution, loss of freedom and economic hardships in their native countries, caused in large part by huge multinational corporations exploiting their country’s resources and backing the first puppet government that would protect their interests by promising a western-style “democracy” (aka capitalism) while turning their backs on human rights violations committed in pursuit of “democracy”. You are being extremely naïve to think that those same immigrants (illegal or not) would willingly give up the freedoms guaranteed to them by their adoptive country after having already lost them once before. Take a trip to your local range and see if immigrants are not well represented!

Following your logic would it make it just as easy to turn the blame on residents who, having never experienced the hardships of war and strife in their lifetimes, or never having needed to hunt or trap in order to feed themselves and their families, have grown up completely indifferent to, and intolerant of, the culture surrounding the use of firearms for protection and sustenance. These are the people who are giving (not taking) gun rights away by standing idly and continually voting into office the politicians who refuse to uphold the Constitution they swore to protect.

This is not about Democrats and Republicans but about where we stand on our rights as Americans.
Reply With Quote
  #304  
Old 06-26-2013, 9:40 AM
Shasta Frog's Avatar
Shasta Frog Shasta Frog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Redding, Ca
Posts: 740
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Reply With Quote
  #305  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:05 AM
rollme's Avatar
rollme rollme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kalifornutistan del Sur
Posts: 121
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fonzy View Post
Um NO. Don't blame Illegals they can't even vote. Don't blame them having kids. I guarantee they aren't voting for banning guns. Mexico can't have guns only criminals can. You think they want to continue this here?
Some do, and their kids (born here so instant citizen) do, and they vote, like most Dems, for reps that want bans. Mostly ignorantly because they are focused on one or two issues like immigration and healthcare/welfare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fonzy View Post
I seriously doubt my people the Illegals are behind this. Go somewhere else with that. I know California can't be the only state with Illegals yet were the ones with the stupid gunlaws. Come on now.
Wrong, other states have the same problem, Colorado and Nevada are witnessing the socialist agenda making inroads. I know firsthand how the majority of hispanics think and believe about this, which is reflected in ALL of the political demographic research.
__________________
"Liberty isn't going to come by trying to take over Washington DC, or the republican party, or the democratic party, or your state caucus or a national convention. There is no “lesser of two evils.” They’re all evil."
Michael Boldin
TAC
http://www.selfgovernment.us
Reply With Quote
  #306  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:27 AM
kotetu's Avatar
kotetu kotetu is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,125
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Last time I checked it was the legislature that does the actual voting. Whoever votes for those who vote for gun bans shares responsibility.

Supposing an illegal alien, or their child votes for a democrat in CA who promises them healthcare, and that democrat supports gun control, then the voter is equally voting for gun control.

Nothing is done in a vacuum.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by NRA spends more money in CA than it takes in from here. Please stop spreading misinformation.
-
sbrady@Michel&Associates
Read the full post about NRA activities in CA here.
Reply With Quote
  #307  
Old 06-26-2013, 9:42 PM
santamonica9's Avatar
santamonica9 santamonica9 is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the peoples socialist republic of los angeles
Posts: 1,476
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

cant we kick these idiots out of office for enacting laws against the 2nd amend???
__________________
I mainly shoot .22lr, 9mm,45 acp, 357 & 38, 12G, 7.62x39, .308, .223/556, 7.62x54r, 300 win mag, 8x57
God Bless USA
Reply With Quote
  #308  
Old 06-26-2013, 9:47 PM
thrasherfox thrasherfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,319
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Everyone needs to NOT register their weapons or comply with unconstitutional laws.

If noone registers their weapons it will almost be impossible to enforce due to man power and lack of funding.

If half the population rolls over and registers then it will hurt those standing for their rights.

Registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation at some point or another.
__________________
1 Peter 3:15

But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect

2 Corinthians 3:3
You show that you are a letter from Christ, the result of our ministry, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #309  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:29 PM
Loco45's Avatar
Loco45 Loco45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 443
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrasherfox View Post
Everyone needs to NOT register their weapons or comply with unconstitutional laws.

If noone registers their weapons it will almost be impossible to enforce due to man power and lack of funding.

If half the population rolls over and registers then it will hurt those standing for their rights.

Registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation at some point or another.
I totally agree and this ain't just talk like some on the board think. Cowering to these unconstitutional laws only shows that people ain't got no real balls! Our founders didn't cower to the regulars when they wanted the people to give up their guns, they stood for what they believed in and they were only 3%! I stand with the constitution and I have NO guns to register. (no disrespect towards anybody with this post, I'm just speaking my mind)
__________________
Airgun and firearm enthusiast.

Last edited by Loco45; 06-26-2013 at 11:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #310  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:43 PM
SoCal7's Avatar
SoCal7 SoCal7 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 47
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Does this bill affect lever-action rifles?
Reply With Quote
  #311  
Old 06-26-2013, 11:24 PM
Loco45's Avatar
Loco45 Loco45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 443
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Only if they have detachable mags if I understand it correctly. Maybe since it's not semi-auto you might be good, but with politicians who think bullet buttons make guns almost fully auto, you never know.
__________________
Airgun and firearm enthusiast.
Reply With Quote
  #312  
Old 06-27-2013, 12:59 AM
shweller's Avatar
shweller shweller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 72
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrasherfox View Post
Everyone needs to NOT register their weapons or comply with unconstitutional laws.

If noone registers their weapons it will almost be impossible to enforce due to man power and lack of funding.

If half the population rolls over and registers then it will hurt those standing for their rights.

Registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation at some point or another.
X2

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Reply With Quote
  #313  
Old 06-27-2013, 6:52 AM
p7m8jg's Avatar
p7m8jg p7m8jg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Almost heaven, West Virginia
Posts: 1,914
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maddawg46 View Post
To keep this info fresh..........I see people stating all the semi auto rifles they own. Why would you tell the DOJ this? Your asking for trouble down the road.
Good point here. But the NSA probably knows already .....good thing the feds don't share info with the locals most of the time....
Reply With Quote
  #314  
Old 06-27-2013, 10:14 AM
mshill mshill is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beyond the reach...
Posts: 4,228
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal7 View Post
Does this bill affect lever-action rifles?
Please take time to read the legislation.

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...6b9a4695af75d3

It should not matter. If they are continually allowed to redefine "assault weapon" it won't end here. This year they are coming for the semi-autos (even .22s) next year it will be your beloved lever/bolt guns.

The real travesty of all this will be those under the age of 18 who will be deprived of their Ruger 10/22, Marlin 60/795, or Savage 64 or become criminals.
Reply With Quote
  #315  
Old 06-27-2013, 11:31 AM
shamaz shamaz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central Sierra Foothills
Posts: 54
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrasherfox View Post
Everyone needs to NOT register their weapons or comply with unconstitutional laws.

If noone registers their weapons it will almost be impossible to enforce due to man power and lack of funding.

If half the population rolls over and registers then it will hurt those standing for their rights.

Registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation at some point or another.
This boycott of mandated registration is a form of "civil disobedience" as advocated by John Stuart Mill and practiced by people such as Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr, Rosa Parks, etc. I DO like the idea of all of us normally law-abiding legal firearms owners all refusing to register. "Gun control" is really "people control!" Just ask the 290,000,000 people disarmed then killed by their own governments in the 20th century.
Reply With Quote
  #316  
Old 06-27-2013, 3:06 PM
SB1964's Avatar
SB1964 SB1964 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,876
iTrader: 44 / 100%
Default

I'm not giving up my .22's, sorry.
__________________
Yes I took the pic, no I didn't go swimming!
Reply With Quote
  #317  
Old 06-27-2013, 9:30 PM
ERdept ERdept is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Looooong Beach
Posts: 4,698
iTrader: 62 / 100%
Default

When does this come up for the decision?
Reply With Quote
  #318  
Old 07-01-2013, 6:55 PM
ERdept ERdept is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Looooong Beach
Posts: 4,698
iTrader: 62 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERdept View Post
When does this come up for the decision?
No one knows?
Reply With Quote
  #319  
Old 07-01-2013, 7:47 PM
saiga410 saiga410 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

well lets hope not!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #320  
Old 07-02-2013, 8:31 AM
Steve_In_29 Steve_In_29 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 29 Palms, SoCal
Posts: 5,682
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fonzy View Post
Um NO. Don't blame Illegals they can't even vote. Don't blame them having kids. I guarantee they aren't voting for banning guns. Mexico can't have guns only criminals can. You think they want to continue this here?

This goes beyond that. First it starts with the gun control. 2nd we have seen the IRS targeting groups. 3rd it's obvious the government is tapping phone lines and using drones. 4th where are all these fema camps that are supposed to help us in natural disasters? Why didn't they help those folks in OK when the tornadoes struck. Now this Snowden fellow leaks what the governement is doing. The government labels him a spy. If it wasn't for him what else wouldn't we know about.

I seriously doubt my people the Illegals are behind this. Go somewhere else with that. I know California can't be the only state with Illegals yet were the ones with the stupid gunlaws. Come on now.
Illegals can't vote?? So that explains why the Dems got voter ID laws shut down. Because it's obviously just a waste of time to inconvinience all those "legal" voters by having them prove who they are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:36 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy