|
Concealed Carry Discussion General discussion regarding CCW/LTC in California |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Sac Sheriff hasn’t issued any guidance precluding their use.
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
And no one needs to make an issue out of it by asking them, because when a person makes it necessary for a public agency to officially respond to a question that doesn’t even need an answer, it needlessly opens a can of terrestrial annelids.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Like granular silica through an equatorially constricted chronographic vessel, so are the circadian georotations of our metabolic persistences. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Like granular silica through an equatorially constricted chronographic vessel, so are the circadian georotations of our metabolic persistences. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
No, it's too heavy.
I wouldn't expect to need more than two rounds since I always train to double tap. And if I can't get the job done with 4 or 5 shots (at the most) I'd consider turning in my LTC. I cannot imagine any scenario where I would need more than 11 rounds that I wouldn't go into without a rife.
__________________
Frank One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375 Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Why dont you just carry 2? We are seldom in charge of what happens, and the down side of my way is FAR less a real problem than the downside to doing it your way
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If there isn’t a law which they “feel” should exist, they don’t simply apply it based on their feelings. (That’s DOJ’s job. ) If there is an authority delegated to them, they may regulate it to minimize risk and liability. But, those are carefully-weighed cost-benefit analyses, and aren’t “feelings”. As a former bureaucrat, I’ll tell you that the best way to get a staff analysis done on an issue is to flood the agency with inquiries about the subject. I guarantee you that, if any level of risk or exposure is identified, you’ll get a policy statement prohibiting the subject. I don’t “feel” that; I know it for a fact. Don’t ask for permission; if required, ask for forgiveness due to clear lack of policy guidance. Until then follow Citadelgrad’s guidance and follow the law.
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriffs decide CCW mag capacity
County Sheriffs decide whether CCW holders can carry standard cap mags or not within their respective jurisdictions. San Bernardino Sheriff says 10 rounds. Your mileage may vary but all of the cowboys here offering up their own "legal opinions" about carrying standard cap mags just because they think they can are setting someone up for a major problem if CCW's don't check with their own issuing agencies first. Now let the hate begin. IDGAF.
__________________
Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither liberty or security. Ben Franklin |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Not me
__________________
Only slaves don't need guns We stand for the Anthem, we kneel for the cross We already have the only reasonable Gun Control we need, It's called the Second Amendment and it's the government it controls. What doesn't kill me, better run |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have SCM that I bought prior to 2000 ban but afraid to use it even after freedom week because of Sheriff's policy.
__________________
NRA LifeTime Member |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I ALREADY owned lcms from when they were legal to own. I qualified with my g 19 using lcms before the recent ruling. That was already the case, yet my ia says nothing about it either way. That means I can carry them. Period. Cowboy? Get a clue. If your IA says you cant carry them, obey their mandate. Its STUPID to press the issue and call to ask. They know the status of the law. If they dont want you to carry, particularly if they are going to pull a permit over it, or act like a permit is null, they have to tell carriers that policy. Its not on the permit holder to check every time something new comes up. Keep being meek. It's awesome. YOU DGAF? Yes, you do. You're afraid. Ot what? Describe the major problem. If your ia already had a policy, abide by it. Freedom week didn't change the policy. If your ia didn't already have that policy, explain how people are going to have a major problem if they dont check. You're the guy who screws it up for everyone, spouting fud and bleating "idgaf" Wow.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Citadelgrad87; 04-13-2019 at 11:22 PM.. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If there was not already a policy, DO NOT ASK, it is STUPID to invite a decision on this by asking. There were already ccw holders who carried legally owned lcms, and if your ia was fine with that, why rock the boat?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Citadelgrad87; 04-13-2019 at 11:40 PM.. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
I carry a 380, 9mm and a two shot derringer. No problem with mags at all. In NV, it isn't on the CCW what you carry.
__________________
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
From a simple logic standpoint, it seems there is some very forcefully presented BAD advice here.
Most, if not all, IA's in CA have never had an official policy on SCM's... They didnt need to have a policy. It was, essentially, a non issue. For the vast, overwhelming majority of people in CA, SCM's were illegal. There was no need to have a policy governing something that was only going to come up once in a blue moon... Or less! Now things havr changed. Rather drastically. Some IA's, such as San Bernardino, DO now have an official policy. That one city in CA has made it CRUCIAL to contact your IA and....*gasp*... actually ASK them what, if anything, THEIR policy is. Why? The answer is the same answer I give those who chant "concealed is concealed" like its some fricken magic spell or something. The answer is "ignorance of the law (or rules) is no excuse." Breaking the law, or the rules, makes you in the wrong. It could get you in a lot of trouble - to say the least! Do you honestly think telling an officer (or judge) that you never knew about the policy is going to change a damn thing? It wont, no matter how many pseudo macho posts you made on the interwebs. IF your IA does indeed have a policy, you NEED to know about it. IF they already have a policy since "Freedom Week," your asking about it isnt gonna change ANYTHING. But you wont know if thats the case until you ask. Whether you ask or not, the policy may well exist - and you are still accountable to said policy whether or not you knew about it. It's worth the perceived risk of "creating a problem." -Rob |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Blue moon my backside. Anyone over about 45 years old who has been involved with shooting throughout their lives has lcms. Its common, not uncommon. Its uncommon in twenty somethings, ill give you that. Nothing has changed other than that more people now own this type of magazine. It doesnt change the way the firearm works. They are legal to own. Its on the IA to promulgate the regulations they think are appropriate. Sounds like SB already had a policy in place. People in sb should have alreasy known that policy, thats your job as a ccw, know the restrictions and abide by them. But its on the IA to decide what the restrictions are and tell ccw holders what the policies are. “Ignorance of the policy?” I am given pages of paperwork upon renewal. The policy for notification to my IA after any le involvement, carrying or not, changed this time around. Know how i know that? They TOLD ME. Before they told me, that wasnt the policy because they hadnt notified ccw holders. Thats how it works. THEY HAVE TO TELL ccw holders when they change policies or issue new ones, otherwise, nobody knows about them. Ignorance of the law is a lame parallel. I dont get paperwork when the law changes, i do when the ccw regs change. Trust me, i know what i am talking about. What kind of trouble do you think you would be in if your IA decided tey would not let people carry lcms but they didnt tell anyone? You shot some guy using an lcm, but didnt know about the policy because the IA sat on it and didnt bother to send an eblast. You dont understand the law. If my agency suddenly decided only derringers were permitted, but didnt tell me, i am not subject to penalty for not knowing. They have a mechanism to make their rules and tell us about them. It isnt a seat of the pants thing. They know about the ruling. NOBODY chuckled “concealed means concealed”. The issue is known to them. It is now legal for anyone in this state to own AND USE lcms. They dont need pinheads calling fifity times a day to ask if using a legal magazine is “ok”, and as has been pointed out, the only result of those inquiries will be a new policy that says we cant use them. Its not worht the REAL risk of getting. Abad decision made. Dont do it.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
are you ccw guys using standard capacity mags>
Quote:
•Rosewood grips •Engraved initials •Holsters: IWB/OWB/etc, cant, material (leather , Kydex, hybrid, etc), color (is chartreuse okay)? •Laser sights, Streamlights, light sabers, gas-fired poison dart attachments, etc •Carry attire: Cargo pants, loose/untucked shirts, “shoot me first” vests, colorful tropical themed hats to distract the attention of would-be robbers/assailants, polarizing sunglasses •Caltrops to throw on the ground as a non-lethal deterrence to pursuers if you run out of ammo in those 10 round mags while engaged in a gunfight with multiple barefoot or flip-flop shod attackers, and other vitally important stuff. Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Like granular silica through an equatorially constricted chronographic vessel, so are the circadian georotations of our metabolic persistences. Last edited by Old_Bald_Guy; 04-14-2019 at 8:01 AM.. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As ccw holders, we all need to know and follow the policies. They were formed and promulgated by people whose job it is to place limitations on what ccw holders can use. They are better at it than you, and they are not shy about making and notifying about policy changes. DO NOT CALL “just to ask”. Its stupid and invites an adverse ruling. Dont be that guy.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not sure if you saw/read my original post but I said I wasn’t going to ask the IA. However, in light of recent court ruling, many folks whom didn’t have a chance to own SCM in the past now do and may be CCWing with them. I just want to know if anyone from my county knows the policy/stance. I am not going to risk losing my permit if Sheriff Gore states otherwise, hell, it wasn’t easy to get one to begin with. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
NRA LifeTime Member |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Why ask them !!!, it’s not illegal, if it wasn’t a restriction by your IA, don’t ask permission, that’s we can’t have nice things
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
There is no answer. Some guys just have a mental block against freedom, and need to crap all over everything.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Think about agencies with 10k licenses. Which is more reasonable? The single agency notifies the 10k individuals with specific guidance or, 10k individuals call/write the agency asking for clarification on every issue not under a policy directive?
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Using a large-capacity magazine for CCW is utter stupidity. I don't care what the law may say, it's vague as hell and it's written that way so that they can charge you if they want to. We live in a very anti 2A state, if God forbid you had to pull your firearm and shoot another individual do you really want to give them any opening to charge you for that shooting? If you really need more than 10 rounds to protect yourself in a CCW situation, you're probably hanging out in the wrong part of town anyhow. Carry an extra magazine, stay out of jail and don't give the DA any reason to come after a law-abiding citizen for protecting their life.
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I DO care what the law says, and it doesnt say anything about the size of a magazine being a factor in the determination of self defense. Please never give advice on this subject again. You might want to reconsider carrying anything for self defense.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Though I don't ever intend to be a bad guy...but I may be running to help! |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Not as I understand it. Your IA can tell you can't carry them, but that's about it.
__________________
"The best gun is the one you'll have on you when you need it the most, the one you know how to use, the one that goes BANG every single time you pull the trigger. Whether that gun cost you $349 or $1,100 it's worth every penny if it saves your life, or the life of someone you love.” -Tim Schmit, CCW Magazine July 2015 NRA Lifetime Member : CalGuns Lifetime Member : GOA Lifetime Member |
#70
|
||||
|
||||
That, in itself, is a problem. But, for you to make such an assertion seems to indicate that you recognize the law doesn’t support your position.
Quote:
On that note, regardless of whether you care about it, what specific Code are you referring to as so vague that , “...they can charge you if they want to?”. In my experience, that would also apply to very specific statutes. Quote:
Quote:
Finally, DAs don’t, “...come after law-abiding citizens.” They usually require a law being broken....of course, that’s full circle with you since you don’t care (or know) what the law says.
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
I’m thinking P5Ret neglected to press the sarcasm button before posting.
__________________
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently-talented fool." "The things that come to those who wait may well be the things left by those who got there first." Last edited by Dvrjon; 04-15-2019 at 5:19 AM.. |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And as for needing more than 10 rounds, it's like you didn't even read Judge Benitez's decision. He gave three very solid examples of why a person might need more than 10 rounds.
__________________
"Kestryll I wanna lick your doughnut." Fighter Pilot |
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
STOP.SPREADING.FUD!
__________________
Guns and diamonds are a girl's best friends! |
#74
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Guns and diamonds are a girl's best friends! |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Guns and diamonds are a girl's best friends! |
#76
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Until then I will carry what the law allows. Which is exactly why you should have never asked John,s girl her opinion.
__________________
Only slaves don't need guns We stand for the Anthem, we kneel for the cross We already have the only reasonable Gun Control we need, It's called the Second Amendment and it's the government it controls. What doesn't kill me, better run |
#77
|
||||
|
||||
I dont only because I can only carry 10+1 But if I had a gun that could take a scm I would use it because it is not illegal to use it. May have to get a new gun that can use a scm that seems like a good reason right??
__________________
Keep Smiling!!!! |
#79
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller Ventura County approved CCW Instructor Utah CCW Instructor Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners. CCW SAFE MEMBERSHIPS HERE KM6WLV |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
My issuing agency -OCSD- maintains a web portal page for CCW. When something is important enough to alter their policies, they post it there. Peruta case is an example; the change from self-defense to good cause, for instance. If this rises to the level of a policy change, they’ll post it. I don’t feel like I need to ask them anything about it otherwise. Right now the terms and conditions of the license don’t mention magazine capacities at all. If they’re legally obtained, and legally possessed, I would feel comfortable with my agency.....IF I wanted to carry standard capacity mags. (All in all, I think the state and their tortured thinking is more the entity that we need to worry about.)
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|