Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Rimfire Firearms
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Rimfire Firearms .22, .17 and other Rimfire Handguns and Rifles

View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
Stocky's 4 100.00%
Bell & Carlson 0 0%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2013, 2:33 AM
scm77 scm77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Which Anschutz Thumbhole Stock?

Hey guys, I'm looking for a benchrest style stock for my 10/22 Kidd build and these two are in the running.

1. SKS (Stocky's) Anschutz Thumbhole - Wood laminate. $200


2. Bell & Carlson Anschutz Thumbhole - Synthetic (plastic shell with a reinforced foam core). $230


I think the Stocky's would be a little stronger and stiffer than the B&C, but also a little heavier. The foam core of the B&C sounds kind of cheap...reminds me of how a bicycle helmet is built. I prefer the black finish on the B&C, but the Stocky's in gray or walnut would also work.

So, which one would you choose?

Last edited by scm77; 10-19-2013 at 6:02 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2013, 8:13 AM
damon1272 damon1272 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,193
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

If shooting bench rest then I would go with the stocky's. If you are going to hunt with it then I would go with the B&C. I would not be concerned with the foam core as if it was solid fiber glass it would weight a ton. I caution you on the thumb hole stock to check it first. If you have big hands the thumb hole may be too small.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2013, 8:59 AM
Izzy43's Avatar
Izzy43 Izzy43 is offline
CGSSA Rimfire Coordinator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Idyllwild, Ca (in the snow)
Posts: 2,664
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

If shooting benchrest you want the heavier stock, wood is better, less flex. For instance my Kimber 82G weighs in at 11 lbs and is rock solid on the bench, stays on POA after each shot. A lighter stock won't do that, have to readjust after each shot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2013, 2:22 PM
scm77 scm77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Thanks guys, I was leaning towards the Stocky's. This rifle should come in at 10 lbs at least when it's put together.

I've tried thumbhole stocks before and like them, but one advantage of the Stocky's is that I could easily reshape the grip or thumbhole, whereas doing this on the B&C might weaken it since I'd be damaging the shell.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2013, 9:15 AM
Dinosaur Jr's Avatar
Dinosaur Jr Dinosaur Jr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 1,707
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Wood for the win...
__________________
Laws against murder and attempted murder should have been the only gun control laws ever needed in America...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:00 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.