|
FFL's Forum For open discussion between FFLs and polite questions for FFLs. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Exempt handgun sale...Question
Have a customer that had a malfunctioning Ruger revolver. He sent it back to Ruger and they shipped me a new replacement for him.
Even though it's not a "sale" per se, would he still be subject to the 1-30 rule (since the new Ruger is a replacement) as he has purchased another handgun a few days ago?
__________________
American soldier by choice. Made in America by the Grace of God. So, now it is ironic that the State whittles away at the right of its citizens to defend themselves from the possible oppression of their State. Judge Roger T. Benitez LCM's ruled legal 3/29/2019 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
As far as I know it is not exempt for the 1 in 30. It should be, but it is a different firearm and there is no exemption that I am aware of for replacement firearms. It is just like any other transfer except with documentation it is exempt from sales tax.
__________________
Kemasa. False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse. Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong. Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
This exemption might apply... [PC 27535(b)(10)]
Otherwise the 1 in 30 day wait is in effect. Penal Code 27535 (a) No person shall make an application to purchase more than one handgun within any 30-day period. (b) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to any of the following: (10) The exchange of a handgun where the dealer purchased that firearm from the person seeking the exchange within the 30-day period immediately preceding the date of exchange or replacement. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks Guys...............I'll go with the 1-30...
__________________
American soldier by choice. Made in America by the Grace of God. So, now it is ironic that the State whittles away at the right of its citizens to defend themselves from the possible oppression of their State. Judge Roger T. Benitez LCM's ruled legal 3/29/2019 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|