Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-07-2019, 5:53 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT OF BRIEFS REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-08-2019, 5:44 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

ORDER: (1) Granting Joint Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 17 ]; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Joint Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages [Doc. 18 ]. Plaintiffs shall file and electronically serve their Second Amended Complaint on or before 11/12/2019. Defendants shall file and electronically serve their pleading responsive to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint within 14 days after the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. The Court finds good cause exists to grant leave to both parties to exceed the Civil Local Rule 7.1.h 25-page limit on motion briefs and opposition briefs up to five (5) additional pages. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...35622.19.0.pdf

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-12-2019, 7:02 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-14-2019, 5:46 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO ADOPT EXTENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Quote:
1. Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction was filed and electronically served November 12, 2019;

2. Defendants shall file and electronically serve their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction on or before December 27, 2019;

3. Plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of their motion on or before January 24, 2020.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-15-2019, 6:51 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-22-2019, 6:09 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Defendants' ANSWER to 20 Amended Complaint, by Xavier Becerra, Martin Horan.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-23-2019, 6:58 PM
librarian72 librarian72 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 71
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

I've never seen a response like this before (nuh-uh, don't have to, why did you make me file this). I freely admit that I am not directly employed in the legal profession, but I have read virtually every following linked to this board.

Um. Have any of the legal folks here seen anything like this?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post
US Circuit Courts of Appeal have no deadlines; they work on what they want, when they want. The 9th also seems sometimes to Make Stuff Up in their opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-23-2019, 7:40 PM
ARFrog's Avatar
ARFrog ARFrog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Northern Calif - East Bay area
Posts: 548
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
...nuh-uh, don't have to...

Seems more like -"nuh-uh, you don't have standing, we're Teflon and nothing sticks to us" pretty well describes the response.

Consequently, I don't believe I learned anything new from this.
__________________


ARFrog
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-28-2019, 6:34 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-28-2019, 10:05 PM
darkwater34 darkwater34 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 50
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Oh boy am I going to make a lot of snow flakes and lineral heads explode with this but here it goes I got my ear protection and hazmat suit on.

But it is just fine and dandy to let these young people with under developed brains to vote and go to war and be tried as adults in a court of law. What hypocrites at their best. And these dumb law makers want to let 16 year old's vote.

They do not Becerra and the elected elite get to have their cake and eat it too !!!

I hate to say this but maybe they are right let us raise the smoking age to 21 as they already have and the voting age to 21 and the firearms age to 21 as they already have and the age that these young people cannot enter military service until the of age 21. And a person under the age of 21 cannot be tried in court as an adult.
But let us change the latter of the three before saying what a person at the age of 18 can or cannot have a right to.
This means that parents will be responsible for supporting these young people with under developed brains until the age of 21.

Just saying the law makers don't get to have it both ways and that I disagree as long as the age for being tried in court as an adult, voting age stands and the age to enter military service is what it is as of now these young people have the right to protect their lives, property friends neighbors and family.
In other words let them have their firearms or change the adult age laws across the board.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-28-2019, 10:08 PM
ajb78's Avatar
ajb78 ajb78 is online now
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 1,180
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

No wonder it took forever it load, it's 289 pages
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-03-2020, 10:25 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE BRADY IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-03-2020, 10:40 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Thanks for keeping up with the cases firearmsfino and posting links.
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-08-2020, 9:18 AM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default


When is the hearing for the oral argument? And when is the reply brief due?

edit nevermind reply is due on the 24th and there is going to be no oral argument
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato

Last edited by wolfwood; 01-08-2020 at 9:57 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-14-2020, 4:56 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

All the amicus briefs got denied
Attached Files
File Type: pdf jones-order-denying-amicus-motions.pdf (77.6 KB, 66 views)
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-14-2020, 5:04 PM
Robotron2k84's Avatar
Robotron2k84 Robotron2k84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,065
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

That order is awesome sauce! Love how the antis were completely cut off with partisan condemnation.

Very good!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-14-2020, 5:33 PM
Foulball's Avatar
Foulball Foulball is offline
It smells in here...
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 2,759
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Absolutely spectacular reasoning by the court. Almost as well written as something Benitez might put out. Kudos to this judge.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01-14-2020, 6:05 PM
ARFrog's Avatar
ARFrog ARFrog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Northern Calif - East Bay area
Posts: 548
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

My favorite two lines from the denial of the amicus briefs:

“Plaintiffs’ objection demonstrates that the Giffords Law Center’s
position should be more accurately termed friend to Defendant Xavier Becerra than a friend to the Court.”

Regarding Everytown:

“The Court finds that the amicus brief may prejudice Plaintiffs on the trial level because the brief allows Defendant to have a proverbial “another bite of the apple” due to partisan influence.”

__________________


ARFrog
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 01-14-2020, 9:49 PM
librarian72 librarian72 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 71
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Hmm judge was apt by bill clinton. Quick, tell KC we got an exception to his rule!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-14-2020, 9:52 PM
-hanko's Avatar
-hanko -hanko is online now
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area & SW Idaho
Posts: 11,481
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default Judge James Lorenz Denies Giffords, Everytown, and Brady Amicus Briefs

"Plaintiffs’ objection demonstrates that the Giffords Law Center’s position should be more accurately termed friend to Defendant Xavier Becerra than a friend to the Court. Accordingly, the Court will not consider the Giffords Law Center’s amicus brief as its’ usefulness is diminished at the trial level due to its obvious partisanship. Therefore, Giffords Law Center’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief [doc. 26] is DENIED."

"Moreover, the Court hereby DENIES five (5) Requests to Appear Pro Hac Vice [docs. 41-45] submitted by attorneys attempting to make appearance for Everytown."

The Order is pretty good.
__________________
True wealth is time. Time to enjoy life.

Tactical is like boobs...you can sell anything with it....arf

Heaven goes by favor.
If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in. Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-14-2020, 9:58 PM
nyla's Avatar
nyla nyla is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 312
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Beautiful. Thank you for sharing.

It shouldn’t even need to be said how obviously biased their “research” is. It’s total BS.
__________________
Quote:
"The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - Hon. Roger T. Benitez
Quote:
“To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” - George Mason, 1788
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-14-2020, 10:24 PM
big red big red is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,268
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I think a certain judge did not like these leftist idiots taking him for a fool. Maybe judge Benitez found himself a golfing partner (LOL). intelligent judges are hard to come by in today's world much less ones that try to defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights .
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-15-2020, 3:16 AM
Uncivil Engineer Uncivil Engineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 587
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -hanko View Post
"Plaintiffs’ objection demonstrates that the Giffords Law Center’s position should be more accurately termed friend to Defendant Xavier Becerra than a friend to the Court. Accordingly, the Court will not consider the Giffords Law Center’s amicus brief as its’ usefulness is diminished at the trial level due to its obvious partisanship. Therefore, Giffords Law Center’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief [doc. 26] is DENIED."



"Moreover, the Court hereby DENIES five (5) Requests to Appear Pro Hac Vice [docs. 41-45] submitted by attorneys attempting to make appearance for Everytown."



The Order is pretty good.
A Clinton appointment as well. What is going on, it's like all of a sudden we are seeing socal judges find a spine.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-15-2020, 9:23 AM
sfpcservice's Avatar
sfpcservice sfpcservice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Suisun City
Posts: 1,761
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncivil Engineer View Post
A Clinton appointment as well. What is going on, it's like all of a sudden we are seeing socal judges find a spine.
Possibly we are seeing the "reasonable left" feel free to come out in favor of rights after the court packing that has taken place... They were probably in hiding and feeling safer now.
__________________
http://theresedoksheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/gridlock.jpg


John 14:6
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-24-2020, 9:30 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,309
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

reply brief https://www.scribd.com/document/4442...Reply-Brief-PI
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 01-25-2020, 8:22 PM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 01-25-2020, 8:59 PM
Robotron2k84's Avatar
Robotron2k84 Robotron2k84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,065
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Good on plaintiffs’ lawyers for calling out the BS studies and statistics that DOJ counts as fact. Bravo!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:35 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2020, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.
Tactical Pants Tactical Boots Tactical Gear Military Boots 5.11 Tactical