Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-12-2013, 2:31 PM
RickD427's Avatar
RickD427 RickD427 is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: King County
Posts: 9,108
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p7m8jg View Post
This law will go nowhere. Thought up by those ignorant of the Constitution and precedent - covers most of those in Sacratomato.
This proposed L.A. City ordinance doesn't have to go anywhere.

The same provisions are already in place in state law.

We've had some lively discussion in other threads concerning Nuisance Magazines and the legal status of the state statute authorizing seizure and destruction.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-16-2013, 2:59 AM
mcmikel61 mcmikel61 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 197
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

First reaction is this is another example of why one should not live in Los Angeles. Second reaction is this is a prime example of what is wrong with California these days.
I love this state. I think it the most beautiful place in the world. But it drives me bananas that it has become populated by people who care not for freedom.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-16-2013, 7:08 AM
anthonyca anthonyca is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,316
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
This has been discussed before. A nuisance is a civil action. You can't get arrested for it.
If one of us stole a citizen's legally owned private property and had it destroyed just because we didn't like it, we would be held liable and probably be criminally charged. This should be no different if a government agent did the same.
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Union...70812799700206

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wherryj View Post
I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-16-2013, 7:41 AM
Manolito's Avatar
Manolito Manolito is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milford California Pop. 72
Posts: 2,324
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I just want to throw out to all of those that continue to say don't live in LA or move out of California or move to a better neighborhood.

Each of us does what ever it takes to feed our families and make a better life for our children. When we swear the oath and go to other countries to fight it is for the United States as a whole not excluding California or LA etc. If a family has spent a life building equity in a home and rising within a company the option of moving is not always real.

I lived in a lot of places not so good while climbing the corporate ladder location was not a choice.

I can't understand how you decide where a person lives is their fault and they should move to fix a problem.

It is what it is folks I guess people could own nothing and look to the government for their income and move anytime they want.

Rant Off.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-16-2013, 9:01 AM
turinreza's Avatar
turinreza turinreza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 1,151
iTrader: 5 / 86%
Default

They dont care if it's legal or not. They just want results and if they can confiscate as much as they can knowing that this is just an excuse to get into the doors to remove firearms or magazines they will come up with laws as much as possible in order to get rid of arms from law abiding citizens not caring if they have them arrested or not.

They are "caring" for the law abiding by taking away their dangerous weaponry and they fill that they are doing them a favor.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-16-2013, 9:06 AM
diverwcw's Avatar
diverwcw diverwcw is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Casa Grande, AZ
Posts: 2,693
iTrader: 57 / 100%
Default

We will fight them all the way but we really need to remember these things come election day. VOTE THEM ALL OUT OF OFFICE!
__________________


Former Front Sight Commander Member
NRA Benefactor Life Member www.nra.org
CRPA Life Member www.crpa.org
NRA Instructor: Pistol, Personal Protection in the Home, Range Safety Officer
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-16-2013, 1:15 PM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow
Posts: 1,996
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winnre View Post
I was advised at CCW class to NOT carry mags over ten rounds, even if you have legal ones that are larger. Why? Because of this.

YES it is illegal. But....
YES you will get arrested;
YES you can lose your CCW;
YES you may get cleared in court, but
YES it will cost you time, money, and heartache to do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdd View Post
This has been discussed before. A nuisance is a civil action. You can't get arrested for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyca View Post
If one of us stole a citizen's legally owned private property and had it destroyed just because we didn't like it, we would be held liable and probably be criminally charged. This should be no different if a government agent did the same.
What a non-sequitur. I was responding to the idea that the person who possessed the standard mags could not be arrested for simple possession. The state law allows confiscation as a civil action brought by the state or local government.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-16-2013, 11:02 PM
GettoPhilosopher's Avatar
GettoPhilosopher GettoPhilosopher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 1,814
iTrader: 66 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winnre View Post
I was advised at CCW class...
Why does this kind of sentence always end in FUD?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-17-2013, 10:52 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,151
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GettoPhilosopher View Post
Why does this kind of sentence always end in FUD?
No ****.

-Brandon
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-17-2013, 11:02 PM
DisgruntledReaper's Avatar
DisgruntledReaper DisgruntledReaper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,844
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

OK I need concrete confirmation... this 'public nuisance stuff is BS.....

Basically I have used up all my 10 mags for a certain rifle due to me wanting to keep them more original and since there are no real viable 'bullet buttons' for them, I have had to make them 'fixed' .... So all I have left are preban mags of STD 20 rd capacity ,most with clearly worn finishes and some dents.... So the couple rifles I have made 'featureless' now have to use these since I believe 10rd mags are either not being made any more OR are STUPID $$$$$$. Since I have kept them as original as possible, they are too long to fit in my vehicle where I have to have them.... otherwise they are in cases on the floor behind the front seats... kind of pisses off the back seaters

I also have to say that when I found out about this , I was floored... just 'love' the way crap get s instituted and you find out the 'hard way'....

Frikkin DOUCHE BAGS every single one of the turds running this place... public servants huh??? Thin they need like 10 lashes each to remind them WHO they ACTUALLLY work for...

Thank you guys, I have read all the posts and links, just want extra confirmation....
__________________
'There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live.'

'I have so many good karma points I am approaching Saint Hood'

"They tell you of a laundry detergent that takes out bloodstains- I'm thinking that if you have clothes covered in bloodstains-maybe laundry isn't your biggest problem"

[SIGPIC]http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/signaturepics/sigpic27069_2.gif[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-17-2013, 11:17 PM
Tripeaks69's Avatar
Tripeaks69 Tripeaks69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 942
iTrader: 11 / 87%
Default

Wow, we r sacked here in LA. both leading city attorney candidates are ANTI GUN


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-19-2013, 9:24 AM
winnre's Avatar
winnre winnre is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IE, Southern CA
Posts: 9,214
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GettoPhilosopher View Post
Why does this kind of sentence always end in FUD?
No, the entire issue ends in FUD, but the cops can still haul you in. It is the COPS who teach the class and the COPS who tell you what they will haul you in for. The fact that you are right and they are wrong does NOT mean your day will not be ruined just the same.
__________________
"If Jesus had a gun he would be alive today"-Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-21-2013, 9:33 AM
kantstudien's Avatar
kantstudien kantstudien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: so cal
Posts: 1,796
iTrader: 40 / 100%
Default

CCW class usually ends up in FUD, that's true. But it is good to know the perspective (however wrong it might be) of people who would be enforcing the "law" on you.

Also, can someone catch me up to speed on Trutanich? Is he anti-gun now or something? I thought he was the Savior of the 2nd Amendment in CA a few years ago...
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-21-2013, 11:13 AM
Prostking's Avatar
Prostking Prostking is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: East Bay
Posts: 83
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

__________________
~ProstKing~
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-21-2013, 4:52 PM
Sunday Sunday is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shasta Co.
Posts: 5,574
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgun Man View Post
It is time to deflate completely. Our governing powers no longer have any credibility.
But they get away with all they do.
__________________
California's politicians and unionized government employees are a crime gang that makes the Mexican drug cartels look like a Girl Scout Troop in comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-21-2013, 10:34 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,151
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

COPS are not lawyers. COPS regularly violate peoples' rights. COPS may haul you in, but THEY will go for a ride (as long as you really didn't break the law).

If you want to avoid risk, carry unicorn horns and glitter. Otherwise, know the law better than the cops - and when to STFU. Oh, and this.

-Brandon

Quote:
Originally Posted by winnre View Post
No, the entire issue ends in FUD, but the cops can still haul you in. It is the COPS who teach the class and the COPS who tell you what they will haul you in for. The fact that you are right and they are wrong does NOT mean your day will not be ruined just the same.
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-25-2013, 7:00 PM
Claymar Claymar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winnre View Post
I was advised at CCW class to NOT carry mags over ten rounds, even if you have legal ones that are larger. Why? Because of this.

YES it is illegal. But....
YES you will get arrested;
YES you can lose your CCW;
YES you may get cleared in court, but
YES it will cost you time, money, and heartache to do it.
NO if pre-ban it is not illegal to posses
YES you might get arrested, however a DA would be unable to issue based on lack of corpus
NO you would not loose CCW unless charged and convicted (go back to previous YES
YES you would be cleared in court if it gets that far
YES it may cost time and money
BUT it will cost only if you fail to pursue the false arrest and or wrongful prosecution.
Bottom line know the laws and stick up for yourself.
PS: CCW classes are supposed to inform you as to the state of the law, the state of the law is no deep dark secret read it yourself.

Bought an M&P 15-22 last month and they tried to make me sign a statement verifying that I was aware that a bullet button was required. Kind of tired of so-called experts in these gun laws not knowing squat.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-26-2013, 1:57 AM
HHGT's Avatar
HHGT HHGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,933
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgun Man View Post
Lordy cakes! The government is truly out of control. With all their problems, they want to confiscate magazines, and Carmen Trutanich, a politician we were told to support, spearheads the movement? I thought when you became a lawyer you took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States?

Listen to this. Advance it to 10:15. Its an interview of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-28-2013, 8:00 PM
Sunday Sunday is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shasta Co.
Posts: 5,574
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

The 20 and 30 round magazines are the normal standard capacity magazine for the AR. The normal standard capacity magazine for the AK is the 30 round.
__________________
California's politicians and unionized government employees are a crime gang that makes the Mexican drug cartels look like a Girl Scout Troop in comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-28-2013, 8:24 PM
StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca's Avatar
StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 2,938
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winnre View Post
No, the entire issue ends in FUD, but the cops can still haul you in. It is the COPS who teach the class and the COPS who tell you what they will haul you in for. The fact that you are right and they are wrong does NOT mean your day will not be ruined just the same.
I was reading a "standard magazine" thread on Officer.com and it seems to be the case that most of the Officers there seem to think possesion of a + 10 round magazine is unlawful. Its insane how many LEO's don't seem to know the law. We seem to be dammed no matter what we do.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 3:56 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy