Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Optics, Mounts, Rails and Sights
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Optics, Mounts, Rails and Sights If it aims your firearm, post about it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-11-2013, 4:47 PM
ExtremeX's Avatar
ExtremeX ExtremeX is online now
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,287
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

Wow Randall you really nailed it... very well put.

OP, I shoot with both MIL and MOA scopes, and switch between the two often.

Some of my earlier scope purchases were MIL reticle and MOA turrets and I was quick to understand why that was a huge disadvantage after learning how to use the scopes correctly.

I have since upgraded all my glass, but due to selection and availability I have not standardized on one particular system. Both my Vortex PST scopes are MOA/MOA and both my SWFA scopes are MIL/MIL.

My brain seems to work with MOA better, but having both and using both I find that it’s really not big deal. If I had to standardize on one system I really don’t know which one I would pick, but I would probably end up in the MOA camp due to the finer resolution between clicks.

End of the day, 100% personal preference, and in my case availability driven decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-08-2013, 5:23 PM
desertjunkie760's Avatar
desertjunkie760 desertjunkie760 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 276
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Awesome thread guys. Thanks for taking the time to explain something so confusing in such detail. With that being said, I still have no idea what I am going to choose, MIL or MOA. I like the idea of MOA because us Americans have been tought the standard system our entire life, but my slightly more experienced friend says MIL because it is "what the military uses" and you can find more data with that system.

It also seems to me that some of the MOA reticles would be more user friendly because of the extended reticle lines for drop. In my mind it would make it more accurate for holdoffs and windage using lines somewhat like a graph compared to having to guess into Kentucky space.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-31-2013, 4:22 PM
BigPimping's Avatar
BigPimping BigPimping is online now
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Still in the game playa!!
Posts: 12,594
iTrader: 55 / 100%
Default

Anyone in EB know anything about dialing in scopes? I have never done it.
__________________


"My pimpin' is on the loose! All the freak has to do is latch on like the caboose." Mr. Whitefolks

Buy 'em cheap, stack 'em deep!!

"That brotha wanted the honey, all we wants is da money!!!" Pretty Tony.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-31-2013, 6:09 PM
ar15barrels's Avatar
ar15barrels ar15barrels is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 38,278
iTrader: 88 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPimping View Post
Anyone in EB know anything about dialing in scopes? I have never done it.
Read this:
http://www.caprc.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=36
__________________
Randall Rausch

AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Glock, XD and M&P pistols, Benelli and Remington shotguns: barrel, sight, trigger and receiver work.
Most work performed while-you-wait, evening and weekend appointments available.
Founding member of the CAPRC
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-20-2014, 3:58 PM
NordicDave NordicDave is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 203
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Like my new mil/mil Leupold Mark 6

I'm new to CalGuns, but have been shooting for 30 years. Great forum!

Coming from a lifetime of MOA/MOA scopes, the new Leupold Mark 6 3-18x44mm with the TMR reticle swayed me over to mil/mil!

The TMR reticle appears the best of both worlds in my opinion. Leupold has tick marks where the mil dots would reside with mil spacing.

My own limited thinking was once a hunting target is sized with the TMR ticks, I could more easily adjust elevation with matching mechanicals to measures, and then use the horizontal ticks to judge target speed and use the little crosshairs for windage.

After sizing a target like a deer, judging the hold-off using the same system made sense for me away.

It was an internal struggle to spend that much money on a new scope while moving off of my moa/moa comfort zone.

Mildots were always a challenge, but replacing the mildots with ticks seemed to work for me anyway.

Curious what others think.

-NordicDave
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:49 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.