Quote:
Originally Posted by OleCuss
Whoa!!!
A first-time post which is pretty much nailing it! I don't remember the "most notably" part from the text, but Heller specifies the right to defend your self in your home and there are implications to carry outside the home although they don't get explicit. But IIRC, Heller talked about sensitive places and there would be little point in addressing those if they meant carry to be only inside the home. McDonald similarly indicates support for carry outside the home.
Welcome to CGN I think it will be very good having you on board.
|
Sorry allow me to correct myself, the term is presented in heller reads, "such as self-defense within the home". However, the following statement did present itself in Mcdonald Section IV Page 33, in the Opinon of Justice Alito, J.
"Municipal respondents’ remaining arguments are at war with our central holding in Heller: that the Second Amendment protects a personal right to keep and beararms for lawful purposes,
most notably for self-defense within the home."
This is where I got that from. I have been reading quite a few cases as I prepare *crosses fingers* for a legal suit in hawaii. Sorry for the misquote.
Thank you for the welcome OleCuss. I have been lurking for a little bit to review whats going on in CA; everything here directly affects Hawaii.