Quote:
Originally Posted by randian
A "win" won't be useful if it's a narrow shall-issue/carry ruling. Plenty of ways to neuter a shall-issue regime (most commonly by having lots of prohibited places, high fees, training requirements, limited times and places to apply, and/or too-frequent renewals), so I expect we will spend many more years in litigation.
|
Only initially, but this will be easy to clean up.
If we get a positive ruling, "carry" will be the same as "abortion" except that the red-blue states will be reversed. All tricks that have been tried in the past ended up not working and ended up only affirming the SCOTUS ruling.
Here is a glimpse of what can happen: due to games with sensitive areas, SCOTUS "determines that sensitive areas are only those that have secured perimeter and metal detectors." If the antis keep pushing against SCOTUS, this is what *will* happen.