Thread: Sonoma
View Single Post
Old 03-06-2014, 10:55 PM
MudCamper's Avatar
MudCamper MudCamper is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sebastopol
Posts: 4,345
iTrader: 28 / 100%

Originally Posted by dgc357 View Post
I haven't been able to find anything else to back up the SCSO's statement. They must be completely wrong on this.
Well they are wrong that it hasn't gone en banc, but it has been stayed temorarily. But it's just a delay. See these 2 orders:

But this is all procedural bs. IMO we are still going to win this. If you want more details ad nauseum see the multiple Peruta threads in the Litigation forums.

Last edited by MudCamper; 03-06-2014 at 11:50 PM..
Reply With Quote