No one can be realistically expected to understand the nuances of the change in a few words in a sentence in the regulations about what the definition of OAL means relative to past definitions. It's a joke, and if there ever was a problem then that case would blow up the entire AWCA based on the sad fact that there is nothing to charge someone with in the PC. It would be alleged manufacturing of an AW from an AW, which would be laughable at best. The further the antis go in terms of making a mockery of law and regulation the better it is for us, so I actually expect sooner or later we will see this case.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by doggie
Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMACA_MFG
Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
|
"The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez
 
|