View Single Post
  #16  
Old 12-11-2012, 8:43 AM
mdimeo mdimeo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 614
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Clear win.

Illinois, unfortunately, is going to respond with an extremely restrictive may-issue law, and round-and-round it'll go.

Seems like not enough of a split against Kachalsky or Masciandaro to force supreme court review.

ETA: kalchasky/masciandaro summary is on page 17-19. Main holding P.20-21. Dissent starts on 21. I mostly skimmed
before about 15, but it's basically heller-style historical analysis, as is the dissent.

Last edited by mdimeo; 12-11-2012 at 8:46 AM..
Reply With Quote