Clear win.
Illinois, unfortunately, is going to respond with an extremely restrictive may-issue law, and round-and-round it'll go.
Seems like not enough of a split against Kachalsky or Masciandaro to force supreme court review.
ETA: kalchasky/masciandaro summary is on page 17-19. Main holding P.20-21. Dissent starts on 21. I mostly skimmed
before about 15, but it's basically heller-style historical analysis, as is the dissent.
Last edited by mdimeo; 12-11-2012 at 8:46 AM..
|