View Single Post
Old 03-24-2014, 7:53 PM
fizux's Avatar
fizux fizux is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,541
iTrader: 0 / 0%

OP updated with links.

Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
The question was whether the change in OC's policy moots the McKay case against Hutchens-OC (that's what this thread is about), not the Peruta case against Gore-SD.

My guess is that given Hutchens is willing to change to a virtual Shall Issue policy before Gore-SD has exhausted their appeals shows that once those options are no longer available, she'll capitulate quickly and the McKay case will be mooted. But we're not there yet....
Two issues:
1. If Peruta gets withdrawn pending en banc, then what?
2. If this case goes away, can the Sheriff (or a newly elected Anti) change the policy and go back to vNI?
Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

Case Status: Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).
Reply With Quote