View Single Post
  #243  
Old 12-27-2012, 11:55 AM
Ryan_D's Avatar
Ryan_D Ryan_D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Atwater
Posts: 195
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Yes, I know...but a favorable ruling in the Peruta case would go a long way to *forcing* compliance. SAF and CGF would be able to point to the Peruta ruling, as well as Moore v Madigan in addition to D.C. v Heller rulings re: where a right to self-defense exists, while also saying "Look, 9th Circuit already ruled that you have to tell people what your policy is, just like the Yolo County Sheriff has to" (if, in fact, the ruling came back favorably).
__________________
Smith & Wesson M&P Shield .40 S&W -- Ruger LC9 -- Spikes Tactical ST-15 16" .223/5.56 NATO -- Ruger American 30-06 -- Taurus Raging Bull 6.5" .44 Magnum
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."-George Orwell
"You can lead a man to Congress, but you can't make him think."-Milton Berle
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."-Mark Twain
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."-Lord Acton
Reply With Quote